Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/06/11/16:21:38
From: | Andrea Glorioso <sama AT intercity DOT it>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: char **argv vs. char *argv[]
|
Date: | Sun, 08 Jun 1997 13:26:27 +0200
|
Organization: | GloriaSoft
|
Lines: | 21
|
Message-ID: | <339A96E3.775FA388@intercity.it>
|
References: | <5ndap9$mgd AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | asy8.intercity.shiny.it
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Paul Derbyshire wrote:
>
> I've seen char **argv and char *argv[] and am curious which is correct. Or
> are either correct?
>
> --
> .*. Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
> -() < When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
> `*' bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
> Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh
I guess they mean exactly the same, because declaring a variable int a[]
is pretty equal to declaring int ** a. I've seen char * argv[] and
char** argv being used many times without problems. I think they are
also compiled in the same way, but maybe you should try to compile to
assembly code to figure it out.
--
Andrea Glorioso Pelliccioni
sama AT intercity DOT shiny DOT it
glorioso AT intercity DOT shiny DOT it
- Raw text -