Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/06/05/07:02:08
At 11.18 1997-06-05 +0300, you wrote:
>
>On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Peter Palotas wrote:
>
>> How are things going with the next version of DJGPP?
>>
>> What news will it include?
>
>Is anything wrong with v2.01?
>
Well, if you look at the footnote in my message I think you will discover
that I in no way think that DJGPP is a bad product. In fact it's the best
programming tool I've ever come across, and it's amazing that it also is
free. I must thank you and all the other people that have contributed to
DJGPP, it's just a so great product... Thank you all!
But, there are things to be improved ofcourse. Pentium optimizations,
multitasking and other stuff that I don't know about yet. Yes, I know that
there is a version made by the Pentium Compiler Group (Or something like
that) which has optimizations, but that is not an official release and I
know that there also is a multitasking library, but I always feel somewhat
more confident with official releases! =)
And I was just interested in what was being worked on right now, and what I
can expect to see in the next version. =)
So please do not take this as a complaint, because as previously mentioned
I think DJGPP is great!
// Blizzar -- blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se -- http://hem1.passagen.se/dnt
****************************************************************************
Don't tell me about the answer, 'cause then another one will come along soon
I don't believe you have the answer, I've got ideas too
But if you got enough naivity, and you got conviction
then the answer is perfect for you!
// Bad Religion - Generator, The Answer
****************************************************************************
- Raw text -