Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/04/28/20:15:12
Dominique Biesmans wrote:
> 1. Winquake is actually a little faster than the DOS version. (unless
> you'll run it on a low-end PC (e.g. a 486 with 8Mb)
No, I have a P133 16 mb ram. But windoze95 is a piece of sh*t and moves
like it's dead or something.
> 2. Id has anounced they won't make any DOS products anymore.
Why? I have warcraft for Dos and it's cool and all, while the
command&conquer for Windoze95 crashes 10 times a day...
> 3. There is a windows version of Quake that uses OpenGL (GLQuake) and
> it's actually very slow on a non-openGL machine, maybe that's what you
> mean?
No, my mistake. The normal Dos version of Quake runs in a windoze window
but very slow.
Ok, they don't support dos anymore. What about UNIX/LINUX/etc ?
--
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
http://www.cam.org/~tudor
'This is Scott Nudds of the Borg. C is irrelevant.'
- Raw text -