delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk (Jason Barstow) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: testing uclock() |
Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 1997 18:48:43 GMT |
Organization: | Jabber Interactive |
Reply-To: | jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk |
References: | <1 DOT 5 DOT 4 DOT 32 DOT 19970424124818 DOT 002d7ec8 AT ubeclu DOT unibe DOT ch> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 195.188.32.221 |
Message-ID: | <3360fc7f.0@ispc-news.cableinet.net> |
Lines: | 11 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Roger Noss <noss AT pupk DOT unibe DOT ch> wrote: >Also, every third or fourth value is negative - why? Yes,yes, I've noticed this too. Running in Win95 *and* DOS too (I think). I was using uclock() to time the joysticks but the -ves really screwed things up. In the end a wrote a "wrapper" that ignored -ves. Of course I also timed it several times and took an average.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |