| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | mejm2 AT hermes DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk (Michael Meeks) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: memory allocation: malloc vs. calloc |
| Date: | 24 Apr 1997 23:20:41 GMT |
| Organization: | Downing College, Cambridge, England |
| Lines: | 9 |
| Message-ID: | <5jops9$sbc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> |
| References: | <Pine DOT D-G DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970424102456 DOT 20048B-100000 AT dg1> |
| Reply-To: | mejm2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | hammer.chu.cam.ac.uk |
| Originator: | mejm2 AT hammer DOT chu DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
I'm lost here, which is the alloc that gets temp. memory from the stack, and saves fragmentation ? and is there a variant of that that zeros the memory ? Regards, Michael Meeks. -- mejm2 AT hermes DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ...
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |