Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/04/17/12:24:51
From: | Michael Flegel <FLEGEL AT physnet DOT uni-hamburg DOT de>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | spawning NASM from GCC?
|
Date: | Thu, 17 Apr 1997 12:10:54 +0000
|
Organization: | University of Hamburg -- Germany
|
Lines: | 25
|
Message-ID: | <Pine.VMS.3.91-b11-vms.970417120540.194D-100000@sat111.physnet.uni-hamburg.de>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | sat111.physnet.uni-hamburg.de
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Hi there!
I was just wondering if there is any way in which I can spawn NASM
instead of AS for inline-assembly in GCC. Because, frankly AT&T syntax is
giving me the shits. I always thought that anything non-intel was better,
but I don't think it's the case here. (Who ever heard of differentiating
between movl, movw and movb, when it's obvious from the kinds of operands
you use...)
Oh, and a related question: How do I make procs public in NASM, and how
do I include it in GCC? (extrn void _procedure(void) ??)
Anyone who can spawn, use or fight over NASM vs AS, please email me,
since newsgroups are very slow over my server...
tnx in advance
MLF/SLi
;----------------------------------------------------------------------------;
; Michael Lamar Flegel ; Student of Math and Physics in Hamburg, Germany ;
; Am Ehrenmal 2 ;---------------------------------------------------;
; 21516 Schulendorf ; www.physnet.uni-hamburg.de/home/vms/flegel ;
; Germany ; flegel AT physnet DOT uni-hamburg DOT de ;
;----------------------------------------------------------------------------;
- Raw text -