Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/04/05/19:41:11
Hi Colin,
Colin W. Glenn wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, Jose Manuel Lopez-Cepero wrote:
> > Hello!
> > > Is there a means for me to compile just a small part of my program without
> > you have no syntax errors, then the code *will* be effectively compiled
> > and passed to the linkey, which will most likely complain about not
>
> Then basicly keep compiling until compliation errors cease, then do
> redirection to catch linking errors. Sounds reasonable.
And why don't? Adequate prototyping can avoid *all* the errors at
compiling (given that the source is OK). If the one linking want a list
of unwritten (i.e. unreferenced) routines that are still to develop,
that's exactly what he (or she ;]) will get. So I don't mind it as
unreasonable.
I'm sure there _must_ be a smartest/fastest/better way to acieve this,
but hey... which one? Have you got any ideas on the subject?
Bye
--
_*
\ |/_|\/||\ sigma AT ctv DOT es
_\|\/| ||_\ (formerly Sigmatech) Jerez / Cadiz / Spain
- Raw text -