From:	nitehawk91 AT aol DOT com
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: looking for masm
Date:	29 Mar 1997 00:48:14 GMT
Organization:	AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<19970329004801.TAA01382@ladder01.news.aol.com>
References:	<33320f29 DOT 25097458 AT news DOT erols DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ladder01.news.aol.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Im Artikel <33320f29 DOT 25097458 AT news DOT erols DOT com>, enigma AT erols DOT com (enigma) schreibt:

>i've heard about NASM, what exactly is its advantage over gas?

Gas uses the AT&T syntax and NASM uses the same syntax as TASM or MASM.
If you take advantage of using NASM depends on what syntax you learned, I would say. If you programmed all your life with an 'at&t-syntax' assembler, you won't get an advantage using NASM and vice
versa.

Matthias

- Raw text -