Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/03/14/21:13:33
Shawn Hargreaves wrote:
>
> Dominique Biesmans writes:
> >Didn't a very early version of Allegro compile under BC? (version 1.X
> >whatever ...) Shawn probably had a good reason to drop the borland
> >version ;-)
>
> Yup. Prior to v2, Allegro could be used with both Borland and djgpp. I
> can dig out the old code if anyone is interterested, but it was very
> primitive (look through the changes.txt file, subtract everything that
> has been added over the years, and you'll realise that there isn't a lot
> left...)
>
> As to why I dropped the Borland support: I hate writing 16 bit code and
> never want to go anywhere near that stupid memory architecture ever
> again :-)
What about 32 bit borland? Same memory model as djgpp right? pmode?
--
Rob Vasquez
Digital Fx '97
email: digital DOT fx AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
- Raw text -