From:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Interesting benchmark results
Date:	14 Mar 1997 05:20:25 GMT
Organization:	The National Capital FreeNet
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<5gan6p$brg@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970311231818 DOT 2704D-100000 AT is> <33265CAB DOT 1F15 AT eik DOT bme DOT hu>
Reply-To:	ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host:	freenet5.carleton.ca
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Aren't %eax, %ebx, %ecx, and %edx in i386 and above general purpose 32 bit
registers? As I recall it is %esi and %edi that are not usable with
certain instructions.

(Excepting of course stosl and movsl, which are peculiar *instructions*
rather than the registers they disallow being peculiar.)

--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh

- Raw text -