delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | leathm AT solwarra DOT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au (Leath Muller) |
Message-Id: | <199703112309.JAA27312@solwarra.gbrmpa.gov.au> |
Subject: | Re: Interesting benchmark results |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii) |
Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:09:52 +1000 (EST) |
Cc: | demmer AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De, djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.970311231818.2704D-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Mar 11, 97 11:18:49 pm |
> > It might be 67 MhZ/601 Processor. > Then it is not so surprising that a 100MHz (or was it 133MHz?) Pentium > delivers approximately the same performance. Ummm, have you actually _used_ a 601? I have a Mac here using a 601 at 120 Mhz, and it performs about the same speed as a Pentium 20-30... :) The 604's are more comparable for performance to a Pentium, with a 133 Mhz601 ~= P166... Leathal.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |