From:	gfoot AT mc31 DOT merton DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP Structs
Date:	3 Mar 1997 16:50:54 GMT
Organization:	Oxford University
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<5fevhe$qpj@news.ox.ac.uk>
References:	<01bc2673$a4dbe420$8e54dec2 AT satan> <5faj2g$j35 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <5fdlnu$mdt AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mc31.merton.ox.ac.uk
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Paul Derbyshire (ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA) wrote:

: And shouldn't he either be saying struct defPt *, or else

: typedef struct defPt {
:    ...
: } defPt;

In C++, the 'typedef' can be omitted from the definition of struct defPt,
and the 'struct' can be omitted from the definition/declaration of
variables of that type.

I don't think gcc minds people leaving out the 'typedef' in normal C
programs, either.

-- 
George Foot <gfoot AT mc31 DOT merton DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
Merton College, Oxford.

- Raw text -