From:	nikki AT gameboutique DOT co (nikki)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: pentium
Date:	18 Feb 1997 14:41:51 GMT
Organization:	GameBoutique Ltd.
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<5ecf3f$20g@flex.uunet.pipex.com>
References:	<199702161216 DOT HAA10376 AT delorie DOT com>
	<Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970217133936 DOT 15118A-100000 AT santaka DOT sc-uni DOT ktu DOT lt>
	<rzqk9o71dzp DOT fsf AT djlvig DOT dl DOT ac DOT uk>
	<5ebgl8$lan AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	www.gameboutique.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> Why not include an option to build a program into a "super-executable"
> with three copies of the code in it, and at the start a routine to
> autodetect whether you have <586, 586, or 686 and branch to the right
> code, which is properly optimised for that chip?
> (Of course exe's would be up to three times as big, except for the 200k
> startup-code and stub.)

erk no.
much better, use self-modifying code to do the same, wouldn't have to be
3x as big then either.

regards,
nik


-- 
Graham Tootell           
nikki AT gameboutique DOT com  

- Raw text -