Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 1997 09:39:08 +0000
From:	Bill Currie <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: assembler question
To:	markiv AT rangenet DOT com
Cc:	nikki AT gameboutique DOT co, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-to:	billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz
Message-id:	<32F06C3C.265E@blackmagic.tait.co.nz>
Organization:	Tait Electronics NZ
MIME-version:	1.0
References:	<5cltef$2l1 AT flex DOT uunet DOT pipex DOT com> <32EEE110 DOT 20FC AT rangenet DOT com>

Dan Hedlund wrote:
> 
> try : movw (,%%ebx,2),%%ax
> 

Better: movw (%%ebx.%%ebx,1),%%ax

Omitting the base register requires an offset (1 or 4 extra bytes) which 
can (if I'm not mistaken) cause pairing problems on a pentium if the %ax 
register is replaced with a constant (and the operand reversed of
course).

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness.

- Raw text -