From:	aho450s AT nic DOT smsu DOT edu (Tony O'Bryan)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Why two identical typedef are considered an error in DJGPP?
Date:	Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:18:49 GMT
Organization:	Southwest Missouri State University
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<32e22d1c.4599867@ursa.smsu.edu>
References:	<01IE7MKQWZ2Q003361 AT cc DOT uab DOT es> <Pine DOT A41 DOT 3 DOT 94 DOT 970115082052 DOT 92882A-100000 AT acs2 DOT acs DOT ucalgary DOT ca> <jRKDPBAXkX3yEw9J AT foobar DOT co DOT uk> <slrn5e086r DOT gp5 DOT davep AT hagbard DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	forseti.i53.smsu.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Sat, 18 Jan 1997 01:01:22 GMT, Dave Pearson <davep AT hagbard DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
wrote:

>#ifndef BYTE
>typedef unsigned char BYTE;
>#endif
>
>#ifndef BYTE
>typedef unsigned char BYTE;
>#endif

GCC complains about a redefinition, but will allow a #define in place of the
typedef.  Turbo C allows both versions.

Sorry for the extra text, but Free Agent won't let me send a message that has
more quoted material than new. :(

- Raw text -