| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:26:06 +0200 (IST) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| To: | Leendert Combee <combee AT cambridge DOT scr DOT slb DOT com> |
| cc: | Glynne Casteel <glynnec AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: f2c+djgpp |
| In-Reply-To: | <199701131043.KAA01153@tartan.scr.slb.com> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.970113132419.9985E-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Mon, 13 Jan 1997, Leendert Combee wrote: > No!, on return a[i] correspond now to a[i+1] before the function was called > (+whatever happened in the function). Because a (not *a) is a pointer, Can you post the original Fortran code that *called* that function? How come `a' itself is a pointer? is it a matrix or something?
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |