Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/01/01/03:57:08
derek greene wrote:
>
> has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
> intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
> it for me and it is starting to piss me off
That would be *impossible* to do because djgpp is just a port of unix's
gcc to dos(with some enhancements) and gcc uses AT&T syntax.If you would
cange the syntax,the programs wouldn't compile under other gcc's on
other systems.
--
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
http://www.cam.org/~tudor
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d-(--) s(-):(+) a? C+ UL>++++ P L>+++++ E- W++ N o K---(----) w---
O---- M-- V-? PS+++ PE Y PGP t+ 5-- X+++>++++ R tv b+ DI D+ G e->++
h>++ r- y>+++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Raw text -