Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/12/30/19:53:52
derek greene wrote:
>
> has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
> intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
> it for me and it is starting to piss me off
It's just a question of learning the new syntax. Most users who use
AT&T syntax have found it to be superior to Intel once they get used to
it. Try looking in the FAQ and the as docs for instructions on the AT&T
syntax, and check out Brennan's Guide to Inline ASM at
<http://www.rt66.com/~brennan/djgpp/djgpp_asm.html>. It's _the_
reference for DJGPP users. ;)
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I | fighteer AT cs DOT com |
| Plan: To find ANYONE willing to | http://www.cs.com/fighteer |
| play Descent 2 on DWANGO! | Tagline: <this space for rent> |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Raw text -