From:	Duncan AT voicenet DOT com (Ray Duncan)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	go32 stub
Date:	Mon, 30 Dec 96 09:37:10 GMT
Organization:	Voicenet - Internet Access - (215)674-9290
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<5a8j9n$ip2@news1.voicenet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	wilmington113.voicenet.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Gentlemen, am I just seeing things or is this just keeping me up all night.
When I strip an executable that has the 10/26/96 version of the stub.
I get an 08/26/96 version of the stub for that executable (See below for
the details).
It seems to me that strip has an 08/26/96 stub contained in it that it uses
when it strips an executable.
        1) Does this create a problem
        2) Why does it do this?

---------------------- details ------------------

/usr/src/mess/bin> cp strip.exe strip1.exe
/usr/src/mess/bin> strip strip1.exe
/usr/src/mess/bin> ls -l strip*
-rwxr-xr-x   1 duncan   dos        310784 Nov  1 00:17 strip.exe
-rwxr-xr-x   1 duncan   dos        310784 Dec 30 08:57 strip1.exe
/usr/src/mess/bin> cksum strip*
1820436798 310784 strip.exe
1489479680 310784 strip1.exe
/usr/src/mess/bin> ident strip*
strip.exe:
     $Id: stub.asm built 10/05/96 20:49:00 by djasm $
     $Id: stub.asm built 08/26/96 21:04:04 by djasm $
     $Id: DJGPP libc built Oct 31 1996 19:13:19 by gcc 2.7.2.1 $

strip1.exe:
     $Id: stub.asm built 08/26/96 21:04:04 by djasm $
     $Id: stub.asm built 08/26/96 21:04:04 by djasm $
     $Id: DJGPP libc built Oct 31 1996 19:13:19 by gcc 2.7.2.1 $



Ray Duncan

- Raw text -