From:	timolmst AT cyberramp DOT net
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gcc compiles so slow?
Date:	Sat, 21 Dec 1996 16:36:45 GMT
Organization:	CyberRamp.net, Dallas, TX (214) 340-2020/(817) 226-2020 for info
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<59h3dj$23r$1@newshost.cyberramp.net>
References:	<199612171748 DOT MAA13875 AT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pm4-16.cyberramp.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>You can't extrapolate from such a small sample (one test).  You need
>to compile a larger source also to determine what the static overhead
>is.  For example, Borland might be 0.1 sec/line, but DJGPP might be
>0.05 sec/line plus 8 seconds of overhead.

I think you're all missing the important point here. What diffference
does it make? I can't tel thedifference between 0.1 sec/line and 0.05
sec/line. It's no big deal. Try asking Borland, or Microsuck, for free
tech support! They'll just ask you what kind of funny plant vapors
you've been smoking.

- Raw text -