Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/12/17/06:42:27
Kevin D. Quitt wrote:
>
> >tfm[(y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius)]=(y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius);
> >tfm[(-y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius)]=(-y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius);
> >tfm[(y+radius)*diameter+(-x+radius)]=(y+radius)*diameter+(-x+radius);
>
>tfm[(-y+radius)*diameter+(-x+radius)]=(-y+radius)*diameter+(-x+radius);
>
> >tfm[(y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius)]=(b+radius)*diameter+(a+radius);
> >tfm[(-y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius)]=(-b+radius)*diameter+(a+radius);
> >tfm[(y+radius)*diameter+(-x+radius)]=(b+radius)*diameter+(-a+radius);
>
>tfm[(-y+radius)*diameter+(-x+radius)]=(-b+radius)*diameter+(-a+radius);
> >tfm[(y+radius)*diameter+(x+radius)]=(b+radius)*diameter+(a+radius);
>
> Boy, those two snippets optimize so beautifully on almost everything but
> the Intel FPU.
>
So what. All of this is in integers, so the FPU is not involved.
Francois
- Raw text -