From:	Stefan Rajec <rajec AT isr DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.programming,comp.unix.programmer,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject:	Re: quickbasic record to c struct?
Followup-To:	comp.os.msdos.programmer
Date:	11 Dec 1996 17:58:22 +0100
Organization:	ISR, University of Stuttgart, Germany
Lines:	16
Sender:	rajec AT bube
Message-ID:	<71via9nhld.fsf@isr.uni-stuttgart.de>
References:	<58gksj$ign AT butterfly DOT hjs DOT com> <32ACD779 DOT 6923 AT cs DOT com>
	<1996Dec11 DOT 094130 DOT 2322 AT nntp DOT muohio DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	bube.isr.uni-stuttgart.de
Mime-Version:	1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.84)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

randy AT avian DOT dars DOT muohio DOT edu (Randy Kaelber) writes:

Randy Kaelber:
> John M. Aldrich (fighteer AT cs DOT com) wrote:
> 
> > Finally, as another poster mentioned, BASIC arrays go from 1..n, while C
> > arrays go from 0..(n-1).  Thus, the size arguments to the string
> 
> Are we sure of this? It's been years since I've done any BASIC 
> programming, but I'm quite certain that array indexes started at 0.

It's been years since I've done any Basic programming, but I remember
that there was something like "OPTION BASE 0" in my dialect of Basic,
which sets the arrays to begin at index 0.

	bobo

- Raw text -