Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/09/19/17:19:33
MIKAEL BACKMAN wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I heard that DJGPP would produce faster code than Watcom, so I'm trying to
> port my Watcom sources to DJGPP. I've encountered a few problems with
> this.
>
> ----------------
>
> 1. When using Watcom I declared my interrupt routines as follows :
>
> void (__interrupt __far __cdecl Introutine)()
>
> This won't work with DJGPP, I get a parse error from the compiler.
>
> *** How do I overcome this problem ?
Your best bet is to check the FAQ, your problem is covered in all its
gory details. I don't know the section number but I'm sure Eli will give
it to you.
> ------------------
>
> 2. In Watcom I used pragmas for inline assembly functions.
>
> #pragma aux func = \
> "shl eax,1" \
> parm caller [eax] \
> value [eax];
>
> Doesn't really do much... Just an example.
>
> * parm caller [eax] show where to put the input parameter.
> * value [eax] shows where it will be returned.
>
> *** How do I declare the in & out parameters in DJGPP's assembler AS?
The above would become:
asm("shll $1,%0" : "=a"(value):"0"(param));
see the gcc info documentation for more details ('info gcc "c ex" ex'
will get you to the extended asm section)
- Raw text -