From:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Alaric B. Williams)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Interrupt chaining
Date:	Wed, 18 Sep 1996 20:06:22 GMT
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<843077142.28180.1@abwillms.demon.co.uk>
References:	<51l3mv$8hh AT usenet DOT srv DOT cis DOT pitt DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	abwillms.demon.co.uk
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

selcuk AT econ5 DOT econ DOT pitt DOT edu (Selcuk Ozturk) wrote:

>I am wondering if the chained interrupt handlers (via 
>go32_dpmi_chain_protected_mode_interrupt_vector) are unchained
>automatically when the program exits.

>Selcuk

Oh, yes! Otherwise, we /would/ be in trouble next time the user
touched the mouse etc...

Once, I had a mouse event handler - passed to INT 33, and thus not in
itself a chained interrupt. OK until the program dumped back to DOS.
OK from then on until I knocked the mouse, causing a "moved" event to
be passed to  my program...

KERASH...



---

COMPUTER: We are in position over the Rebel homeworld.
VADAR: Engage the Death Star primary weapon, let those rebel worms die!
COMPUTER: Sorry, your evaluation version of Battle Computer 3.0 has expired. 
          Please send 2.6 billion dollars to the address in REGISTER.TXT

Alaric B. Williams Internet : alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
<A HREF="http://www.abwillms.demon.co.uk/">Hello :-)</A>

- Raw text -