| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | imedia AT interlynx DOT net (Michael Dykman) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: Interrupt chaining |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 96 13:35:04 GMT |
| Organization: | Internet Media Marketing |
| Lines: | 14 |
| Message-ID: | <51otig$gq4@roger.interlynx.net> |
| References: | <51l3mv$8hh AT usenet DOT srv DOT cis DOT pitt DOT edu> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | ppp33-max2.interlynx.net |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Nope. You must put the chain back as you found it before your program exits
or huge black winged creatures will descend on on you and devour your brains.
Michael Dykman
Internet Media Marketing
imedia AT interlynx DOT net
In article <51l3mv$8hh AT usenet DOT srv DOT cis DOT pitt DOT edu>, selcuk AT econ5 DOT econ DOT pitt DOT edu
(Selcuk Ozturk) wrote:
>I am wondering if the chained interrupt handlers (via
>go32_dpmi_chain_protected_mode_interrupt_vector) are unchained
>automatically when the program exits.
>
>Selcuk
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |