Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/09/17/13:43:42
Chris Waters wrote:
> Since there is, as yet, no ansi standard for C++, the question about
> djgpp's conformance is meaningless. Unless you're asking about
> conformance with the C standard. :)
Nonsense. There are very explicit draft standards that are currently under
review for an official ANSI standard.
--
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE http://www.alcyone.com/max/ max AT alcyone DOT com
San Jose, California ICBM 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W R^4: the 4th R is respect
"Gods are born and die, but the atom endures." -- Alexander Chase
- Raw text -