Date:	Sat, 7 Sep 1996 11:20:44 +0000 ( )
From:	Gurunandan R Bhat <grbhat AT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: complex
In-Reply-To:	<3230D55F.469B@cs.com>
Message-Id:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.960907111757.250A-100000@aditya.unigoa.ernet.in>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, John M. Aldrich wrote:

> Gurunandan R Bhat wrote:
> > [snip]
> > this has always worked for me, though i must confess i have never had
> > occasion to port this kind of code to other platforms. in a recent (three
> > weeks ago?) posting (weiqi?) it was mentioned that this is now obsolete
> > and is moreover not quite ansi. the reason had to do with templates etc,
> > something that, i, with almost no deep knowledge of c++, did not
> > understand.
> > 
> > i would be grateful then, if some one could post the canonical syntax for
> > the above sketchy code which is ansi conformant and as portable as possible
> 
> The revised syntax is in version 2.01 of the FAQ, in section 8.11.  I will
> quote from it a brief passage with instructions...
> 

i had read the faq, except that it was the wrong one (2.0). right 
attitude. wrong faq. apologies. 


gurunandan bhat
dept. of physics
goa university
goa. india

- Raw text -