Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/08/25/05:26:27
In <3216381F DOT 5B8D AT intellinet DOT com> "James S. Blachly"
<stew AT intellinet DOT com> writes:
>
>Joshua Cannon Butcher wrote:
>>
>> 7) And for everyone in General, why do you have to stray away
from
>> industry standards? Calling object files .O files instead of .OBJ,
>> calling C++ files .CC instead of .CPP, and .a instead of .LIB for
>> library. HELLO! Its not copyright infringement to use the same
>> extensions, and it would make the transition for existing C and C++
>> users to use. This is quite frankly scaring me, and almost makes me
>> want to pay the $500 for Borland C++ 5.0 so I can have the
"standard" of
>> the computer programming industry.
>>
>> I just do not understand, and would like to. Thank you for your
time...
>>
>> Joshua
>Well, as far as "industry standards", the extensions .o .a and .cc
were
>around in UNIX _BEFORE_ the dos convention of .obj and .lib (and
cpp).
>Please try not to sound so angry and all knowing without first under-
>standing the situation.
>
>As far as three file extensions making you want to pay $500 for
another
>compiler, well, that's your business.
>
>-james.
>James S. Blachly
I would I agree, the UNIX .o .a .cc comes before dos, the guys at
Borland/Microsoft simply changed it for DOS to make you think it's the
standard of C. But you must know, programming is not like C or any
other language. It is not affected whether the extensions are .cc .o
a to .cpp .obj .lib or not. Programming is simply a way to make the
machine(or ask) to do what you want. Not a bunch or standards on file
formats. It doesn't matter! As lone as it can handle ANSI C programs,
it is a Standard Compiler.
- Raw text -