Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7731
From:	Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Need info QuakeC and djgpp relationship -- for debug etc
Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 1996 19:43:29 -0700
Organization:	Alcyone Systems
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<321A77D1.5EBE269A@alcyone.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960819083531 DOT 4450J-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	annex-p140.meer.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Aug 1996, stephen benson wrote:
> 
> > It's quite a while since I used djgpp, but I was looking at the dos
> > version of QuakeC which (initial impression) appears to be a modified
> > djgpp.
> 
> Not modified DJGPP, just DJGPP, the same everybody uses.  Of course, lots
> of code in Quake is written in assembly, but the tools are the same you
> get from the DJGPP archives.

He's not asking about Quake itself, he's asking about QuakeC, the language that
is used for the definition of objects and their relations to one another in
Quake.  The question was whether or not QuakeC is a modified DJGPP.

(I don't know the answer either; I was hoping someone else did.)

-- 
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE   http://www.alcyone.com/max/   max AT alcyone DOT com
San Jose, California   ICBM 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W   R^4: the 4th R is respect
War's a game which were their subjects wise/Kings would not play at. -- Cowper

- Raw text -