| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7427 |
| From: | Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: __attribute__((section)) |
| Date: | Mon, 05 Aug 1996 22:17:36 CDT |
| Organization: | Rice University, Houston, Texas |
| Lines: | 5 |
| Message-ID: | <3206b950.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> |
| References: | <839084378 DOT 8973 DOT 1 AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> |
| Reply-To: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | clio.rice.edu |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
> >you could lock it with a single call, since they would be adjacent > Why's there seperate _go32_dpmi_lock_[code | data]? There is no real difference in these calls, since DJGPP is a flat address space with DS base = CS base. Just unneeded complications.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |