delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7427 |
From: | Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: __attribute__((section)) |
Date: | Mon, 05 Aug 1996 22:17:36 CDT |
Organization: | Rice University, Houston, Texas |
Lines: | 5 |
Message-ID: | <3206b950.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> |
References: | <839084378 DOT 8973 DOT 1 AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | clio.rice.edu |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
> >you could lock it with a single call, since they would be adjacent > Why's there seperate _go32_dpmi_lock_[code | data]? There is no real difference in these calls, since DJGPP is a flat address space with DS base = CS base. Just unneeded complications.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |