Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/08/14/00:45:09
Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7226
|
From: | stwand07 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | rand(), random() or libg++ Random ?
|
Date: | 13 Aug 96 14:09:21 +0200
|
Organization: | University of Cape Town
|
Lines: | 15
|
Message-ID: | <1996Aug13.140921@uctvms.uct.ac.za>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | uctvms.uct.ac.za
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Hi
I am busy working on an optimisation program that makes extensive use of random
number (stochastic search). I have been using srand(time(NULL)) and rand() to
give random numbers in the range 0..1, which I then scale as required. I have
heard that rand() is not very good, so my questions are :
1. Is random() any better?
2. Are the libg++ Random classes better?
I need a normal distribution with zero mean, so 'better' refers to these
criteria.
Adios
Mark Wodrich.
UCT, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Raw text -