Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/08/13/16:45:38
C'mon you are not serious about this question ?!
If you are *really* that heavy into C++ programming, then why don't you just
check for **proper basic syntax** before complaining about GCC's FAQ and STL
and all that.
To be specific: in the code snippet of your mail of Tue, 6 Aug 1996 you have
this line saying
for (vec::iterator ii=v.begin(), ii!=v.end(); ii++)
This is *simply wrong*, and, as I have checked, it exactly produces all of
your errors upon compilation. The correct one is
for (vec::iterator ii=v.begin(); ii!=v.end(); ii++)
Now, ... did you find the little difference .... And btw. with this major
reconstruction, ;-) , your program compiles and works just fine.
________________________________________________________________________
Wolfram Brenig | Tel: +49-(0)-221-470-4309 (office)
Universitaet zu Koeln | -3479 (secr.)
Institut fuer Theoretische Physik |
Zuelpicher Str. 77 | FAX: +49-(0)-221-470-5159
50937 Koeln | Email: brenig AT thp DOT uni-koeln DOT de
GERMANY |
- Raw text -