Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7151
From:	jan AT stack DOT urc DOT tue DOT nl (Jan Oonk)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Intel asm rather than AT&T asm under djgpp?
Date:	12 Aug 1996 12:21:43 +0200
Organization:	MCGV Stack, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands.
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<4un0jn$puk@snail.stack.urc.tue.nl>
References:	<Dvnswo DOT F9z AT serval DOT net DOT wsu DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	snail.stack.urc.tue.nl
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

M@ (hixson AT mail DOT wsu DOT edu) wrote:
: Hello,
:    I am interested in using djgpp to do some C/ASM programming.
: However, I was wondering if it is at all possible to use Intel's asm
: programming syntax rather than AT&T's.  All of the examples I've seen
: on this newsgroup use the AT&T style, and I can't find anything in the
: djgpp docs that say "You can __*NOT*__ use Intel style assembly with
: djgpp."  
:    No, I haven't installed it yet.  I'm hoping someone could answer
: this for me before I go to the trouble.
:    Please reply via email. 
:    Thanks in advance,
:      -M@

Ta2As isn't finished... Use obj2coff instead...

Maybe oneday we'll finish ta2as but we think obj2coff is far superior....

CU!
-- 
Please EMAIL all replys to Jan AT stack DOT urc DOT tue DOT nl

- Raw text -