delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 11 Aug 1996 11:28:59 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | Gurunandan R Bhat <grbhat AT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in> |
Cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: is it true that.... |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.LNX.3.91.960710194142.991B-100000@aditya.unigoa.ernet.in> |
Message-Id: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.960811112724.24678W-100000@is> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
On Wed, 10 Jul 1996, Gurunandan R Bhat wrote: > i just saw it mentioned that malloc allocs in chunks of powers of > 2. for example malloc(1025) will alloc actually 2048. could someone > suggest ways to avoid this waste (in case it is true..) Sure: write your own `malloc'. The current implementation is optimized for speed, not for efficient use of available memory.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |