Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/08/09/07:53:16
On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, John Sabean wrote:
> Matt W. Spencer wrote:
> >
> > >the RSXWDK and RSXNT packages. I got these, but they don't seem to work
> > >with DJGPP v2 (written for 1.x and the OS/2 EMX-GCC). I've taken a look at
> > >the source, and DJGPP 1.x with the RSXNT libraries *does* support fork().
> > >You'd have to be running under Windog though.
> >
> > But that isn't running multitasking under DOS; it's Winblows.
> >
> > So what? you say. Winblows is OK, and other multitasking OSes (OS\2, *NIX,
> > etc.) are better than MS-DOG anyway.
> >
> > But, I spend 95% of my computing time in DOG. I have so for a long time. I
> > have an extensive collection of software for MS-DOG. I'm used to DOG, and I
> > don't want to have to find a whole bunch of matching software for my new
> > OS.
> >
> > Yeah, I know these are weak arguments, but trying to make a DOS Multitasking
> > Environment would be fun, wouldn't it? :)
> >
Not necessarily. If DJGPP can spawns a .EXE (and it can) you
haven't to stop using your favourite/extensive collection of
software for DOS.
Problems can raise from those 'bad-behaviour' programs (according
to Ray Duncan's definition in [Advanced MS-DOS Programming, 2nd ed.
Redmond WA: Microsoft Press, 1988, 6.9]). Mainly, accessing
illegaly to memory which doesn't belong to that program (Video
Ram and Interruption Vectors). But, both Windows and OS/2 have
the same problems with that kind of programs...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Javier Garrido F. (R)JA.GAR. SOFT Dpto. de Computacion e IA
MINIX User. (USENET comp.os.minix & SCS) Facultad de Informatica
Email: Francisco-Javier DOT Garrido AT cs DOT us DOT es y Estadistica de Sevilla
URL: http://www.cs.us.es/~garridof (SPAIN)
"The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long ...
... and you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy."
TYRREL from Blade Runner
- Raw text -