Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6892
From:	Sumo Steve<steve AT maths DOT tcd DOT ie>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Intel asm rather than AT&T asm under djgpp?
Date:	6 Aug 1996 16:09:56 +0100
Organization:	Department of Maths, TCD.
Lines:	9
Message-ID:	<4u7n84$etd@synge.maths.tcd.ie>
References:	<Dvnswo DOT F9z AT serval DOT net DOT wsu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	steve AT maths DOT tcd DOT ie
NNTP-Posting-Host:	synge.maths.tcd.ie
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

hixson AT mail DOT wsu DOT edu (M@) writes:

>However, I was wondering if it is at all possible to use Intel's asm
>programming syntax rather than AT&T's.  All of the examples I've seen

You have to feed in at&t style alright, but I believe theres
an intel to at&t converter on x2ftp somewhere...

Steve.

- Raw text -