Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6873
From:	wgalazka AT zoolook DOT chem DOT uw DOT edu DOT pl (Wojciech Galazka)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Intel asm rather than AT&T asm under djgpp?
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 1996 08:33:54 GMT
Organization:	University of Warsaw, Department of Chemistry
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<wgalazka.106.839320434@zoolook.chem.uw.edu.pl>
References:	<Dvnswo DOT F9z AT serval DOT net DOT wsu DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	andrew.chem.uw.edu.pl
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <Dvnswo DOT F9z AT serval DOT net DOT wsu DOT edu> hixson AT mail DOT wsu DOT edu (M@) writes:
>From: hixson AT mail DOT wsu DOT edu (M@)
>Subject: Intel asm rather than AT&T asm under djgpp?
>Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 10:02:52 GMT
>Hello,
>   I am interested in using djgpp to do some C/ASM programming.
>However, I was wondering if it is at all possible to use Intel's asm
>programming syntax rather than AT&T's.  All of the examples I've seen
>

There is a converter from Intel asm to At&T asm. See djgpp FAQ
Wojciech Galazka
Computer Center
Wydzial Chemii UW
Pasteura 1
02-093 Warszawa
Poland

- Raw text -