Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6765
From:	Orco <mar AT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: asm question
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 1996 21:37:41 +0100
Organization:	Orco
Lines:	13
Distribution:	world
Message-ID:	<hWJQlEAVWRAyEwlB@demon.co.uk>
References:	<Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960731085042 DOT 8839A-100000 AT wilbur>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	gorge.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960731085042 DOT 8839A-100000 AT wilbur>, patrick fox
<web183 AT charweb DOT org> writes
>In intel assembly I use the instruction shld edx,eax,16 to shift 16 bits of
>eax into edx. In at&t assembly, would I use shldl $16,%edx,%eax or
>shldl $16,%eax,%edx? Thanks for the help
>
>-Pat
>

it should be the first: shldl $16, %%edx, %%eax
-- 
Maidul Alam Rahman
mar AT gorge DOT demon DOT co DOT uk

- Raw text -