Date:	Sun, 2 Jun 1996 08:59:58 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Roland Exler <R DOT Exler AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: user-requested stack-trace at exit
In-Reply-To:	<31ADDBB3.45D7@jk.uni-linz.ac.at>
Message-Id:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.960602085808.19090H-100000@is>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 30 May 1996, Roland Exler wrote:

> I think this part of code would help debugging many programs. I'll try to 
> redefine assert() so it will print a stack-trace too.

I think stack trace should be generated by `abort' (analogous to core 
dump on Unix systems), not by `assert'.  If `abort' does it, so will 
`assert', because it calls `abort' in case of failure, but `abort' is 
more general than `assert'.

- Raw text -