Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/05/29/23:35:12
On Wed, 29 May 1996, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> I have patched/compiled it for djgpp.
> The patching is easy, just download gcc272s.zip
> from some djgpp site. Download the patches.
> Then run:
> patch <patch.diff (or whatever it's called)
>
> I don't know why, but the patching failed miserably
> on my dos machine, so i had to do the patching on
> a unix machine, but it worked great.
> (Makefile and Makefile.in failed, but i patched them
> manually, its just some CFLAG= -O2 to add)
>
>
> Then i just did
> configure go-32
> make
>
> which produced cc1 and xggc which i copied to my bin dir.
>
>
> There is only one problem, i don't know if i do
> something wrong, because when i compiled a program
> with -mpentium -O6 (or -O3) it actually got SLOWER!
> Not much, but still. The docs mention 5% always and
> up to 30% in extreme cases. Dunno why, first time i
> build gcc, i might have done something wrong.
>
> Has anyone else tried this?
I read the same post and also built the Pentium-GCC (not using DJGPP
though, I used Linux). I've never built GCC for MS-DOG so please don't
take offense if I'm off the mark.
The thing is, when building GCC, the first build is *always* done with -g
(debugging) and *without* -O (optimize) so as not to stress some
braindead compilers. Of course, if you're building GCC with GCC, you
should edit the Makefile such that the stage1 compiler is already built
with -O2 or whatever...
However, I haven't done that. From your description, you didn't build the
stage1 and stage2 compilers anymore (at least, you didn't mention it). I
think the *best* solution would be:
a) build the stage1 compiler in the appropriate way (you should have done
something like this):
configure go-32
make LANGUAGES=c
make stage1
b) move that stuff into the stage1 directory (actually, make stage1 does
that)
c) edit the Makefile so that stage2 is built with -O3 (or even -O6 if you're
that confident in the Pentium Compiler Group ;)
d) make stage2 (the actual syntax is in the INSTALL file). this way, the
second-stage GCC will be built *with Pentium optimizations* builtin
FWIW, I haven't done any "real" tests, but I rebuilt my Linux kernel
using the Pentium-GCC, and the BogoMIPS output shows no difference (!!!)
of course, the BogoMIPS loop could've been done with asm, which would
explain it...
Cheers,
Orly
orly AT mozcom DOT com
- Raw text -