Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/05/23/00:48:36
On Wed, 22 May 1996, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> > Which is why it *will* be documented in the next release of DJGPP.
>
> I don't disagree it should be documented now that it's clear that it's
> useful and being used. At the time I wrote it, I wasn't clear on if it had
> any use, or if the interface was appropriate (there is another way to do the
> exact same thing setting a bit in a global variable, BTW).
I needed that function in a port of Less (which reads control keys from
stdin *and* needs to be interruptible by ^C), so I submitted the
documentation for it a couple of months ago.
- Raw text -