| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4053 |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: Unused functions & slow linking? |
| Date: | Mon, 20 May 1996 18:30:33 +0200 |
| Organization: | NetVision LTD. |
| Lines: | 13 |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.960520182658.12462D-100000@is> |
| References: | <199605160312 DOT XAA07094 AT delorie DOT com> <DMASON DOT 96May16185805 AT jupiter DOT scs DOT ryerson DOT ca> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | is.elta.co.il |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <DMASON.96May16185805@jupiter.scs.ryerson.ca> |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
On 16 May 1996, Dave Mason wrote: > I presume this factorization into functions is the reason that the > linker is so slow. It seems a *lot* slower than with V1.(13?). No, the library functions were factored that way in v1.x too (any well-organised library should do this). If linking is slow on your system, please post the details of your system configuration. Is DJGPP installed on a networked or compressed drive? Do you use a disk cache? Also try stubediting ld.exe to enlarge its transfer buffer to 64KB; this does wonders to the link times on some systems.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |