| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2430 |
| From: | Hans-Bernhard Broeker <Broeker AT axpmgr DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: Complex numbers again |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 1996 18:14:54 +0200 |
| Organization: | RWTH Aachen |
| Lines: | 16 |
| Message-ID: | <3162A3FE.6C04D027@axpmgr.physik.rwth-aachen.de> |
| References: | <MAILQUEUE-101 DOT 960401155348 DOT 384 AT merlin DOT e-technik DOT uni-erlangen DOT de> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | axpcl4.physik.rwth-aachen.de |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Michael Schuster wrote: > The error is: > Complex: undeclared (first use this function) > Complex is there, but you have to #include <_complex.h> to get at it (on a 'real' OS, that would be <Complex.h>, but on DOS, that would conflict with <complex.h>). The background on this is that libg++ 2.7 has a *template*, complex<type>, in <complex.h> and the older class Complex is now a typedef complex<double> Complex, and has its own header file, to keep things as modular as possible, I suppose. Hans-Bernhard Broeker (Aachen, Germany)
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |