Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:865
From:	terra AT diku DOT dk (Morten Welinder)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: djgpp distribution
Date:	7 Feb 1996 11:36:57 GMT
Organization:	Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen
Lines:	15
Sender:	terra AT tyr DOT diku DOT dk
Message-ID:	<4fa2sp$2te@odin.diku.dk>
References:	<4f76h0$tct AT trog DOT dra DOT hmg DOT gb>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	odin.diku.dk
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

itmiller AT taz DOT dra DOT hmg DOT gb () writes:

>Is it safe to assume that, say, djdev200.zip from v2 beta 5
>is identical to the same distribution file from earlier betas?
>Or could there be the odd minor correction in the more recent
>release despite it having the same file name?

There are any number of minor corrections as well as a couple
of major ones.  Blame dos' 8+3 file names for not allowing
"beta5" to be part of the name.

AFAIK, beta 5 is identical to the first official release,
modulo details in a readme-file.

Morten

- Raw text -