delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:851 |
From: | d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk (Dave Love) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: malloc/free ends up fragmenting dynamic memory? |
Date: | 07 Feb 1996 11:55:12 +0000 |
Organization: | Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK |
Lines: | 12 |
Sender: | fx AT ccp4 DOT dl DOT ac DOT uk |
Message-ID: | <rzqybqfmjtr.fsf@ccp4.dl.ac.uk> |
References: | <DMCyMn DOT G6u AT granite DOT mv DOT net> <31183005 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ccp4.dl.ac.uk |
In-reply-to: | Charles Sandmann's message of Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:52:21 CST |
To: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:52:21 CST, Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> said: Charles> And there are applications in-between. I suggest if you do Charles> a wide range of programming tasks, you start collecting (or Charles> writing) mallocs ... Initially consulting Paul Wilson's allocator survey referenced under http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/oops/ would doubtless be the best ploy. Also there is a link to the Boehm et al conservative garbage collector which has been ported to djgpp and can be used as a debugging malloc if you must use malloc/free.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |