Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4266
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!bcm.tmc.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!news!sandmann
From:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Will DJGPP work on windows 95?
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 1996 09:56:38 CST
Organization:	Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines:	8
Message-ID:	<30f53336.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<DL0A5E DOT FA0 AT jade DOT mv DOT net> <4d2jc1$3c4_001 AT tpd DOT tno DOT nl>
Reply-To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host:	clio.rice.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> Ok, but, when I run it, I don't get more than my physical memory.
> For some reason, it does not use virtual memory (which is much more
> than physical, in my case). What did I wrong?

W95 has some bugs in it's DPMI memory management.  You might try defraggin
the disk, or checking the memory with GO32-V2.  I would hope that beta 4
works better in tight memory than beta 3, but I don't have any feedback
on that.  I can use VM on my 16Mb W95 boxes.

- Raw text -