Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2701
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!genmagic!goonsquad.spies.com!uuwest!alcyone!max
From:	max AT alcyone DOT darkside DOT com (Erik Max Francis)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: clock() unit ?
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 95 07:45:16 PDT
References:	<DGJ9w5 DOT 78E AT natlab DOT research DOT philips DOT com>
Organization:	&tSftDotIotE
Lines:	18
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

kunst AT natlab DOT research DOT philips DOT com (Pieter Kunst) writes:

> max AT alcyone DOT darkside DOT com (Erik Max Francis) writes:
>
> > My copy of the ANSI C 1990 standard doesn't even mention CLK_TCK.
> 
> Perhaps we'd better take the upcoming ANSI C++ standard as a reference ?!?

Well, the question at hand was whether or not CLK_TCK and/or 
CLOCKS_PER_SEC were standard C language features.  A C++ draft 
standard won't help answer that question, since C++ is a different 
language.


Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE // uuwest!alcyone!max, max AT alcyone DOT darkside DOT com
San Jose, CA, USA // 37 20 07 N  121 53 38 W // GIGO, Omega, Psi // the 4th R!
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- // 1love // folasade
_Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt._ // mc2? oo?  Nah. // http://www.spies.com/max/

- Raw text -