| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Xref: | news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2627 |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Path: | news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!mictali |
| From: | mictali AT netcom DOT com (Jere McDevitt) |
| Subject: | Re: Stupped : V2.0 bug? |
| Organization: | NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) |
| References: | <DFzxG1 DOT Bwr AT jade DOT mv DOT net> <3074a309 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <459lk2$cr2 AT thebes DOT waikato DOT ac DOT nz> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 1995 16:22:52 GMT |
| Lines: | 9 |
| Sender: | mictali AT netcom14 DOT netcom DOT com |
| To: | djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu |
| Dj-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Just a thought, but I remember back in my old programming days (pre C++) that all of the "good" programmers said NEVER count on a variable having a value before you initialized it. I know that Borland zero's out the global data, so maybe we've gotten a little lazy expecting a variable to be 0'd without doing it ourselves. My thoughts are my own. Jere McDevitt
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |