Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2489
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!oitnews.harvard.edu!cfanews!cfa0!peprbv
From:	peprbv AT cfa0 DOT harvard DOT edu (Bob Babcock)
Subject:	Re: Lots of small files in DJGPP waste space & should be chained up!
Sender:	news AT cfanews DOT harvard DOT edu
Reply-To:	rbabcock AT cfa DOT harvard DOT edu
Organization:	Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA, USA
References:	<DG2uM1 DOT 5rz AT jade DOT mv DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 8 Oct 1995 05:58:27 GMT
Lines:	15
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

A.Appleyard (A DOT APPLEYARD AT fs2 DOT mt DOT umist DOT ac DOT uk) wrote:
: my department has just got 9 new Pentiums whose hard disk clusters are
: 32K bytes each!!  [and many small djgpp file waste space]

You're going to have this problem with all files, not just djgpp files.
A friend discovered that he was wasting 400MB of his 1GB disk in cluster
overhead.  I know of only two possible solutions: (1) break the disk up
into multiple partitions or (2) format the disk as HPFS which uses 512 byte
allocation units regardless of the disk size.  Option (2) requires OS/2,
but that's not a bad environment for running djgpp.

Actually, there may be a 3rd option: disk compression software may effectively
lower the cluster size.  My Stacker manual mentions the possibility of
changing the cluster size, but is rather vague about how Stacker handles
this problem.

- Raw text -