Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.lang.ada:10956 comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2378
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.ada,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!world!bobduff
From:	bobduff AT world DOT std DOT com (Robert A Duff)
Subject:	Re: GNAT electronic mailing list ready for subscriptions!
Organization:	The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References:	<44idc7$e1h AT felix DOT seas DOT gwu DOT edu> <dewar DOT 812468722 AT schonberg> <44rudk$otd AT fg70 DOT rz DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de>
Date:	Tue, 3 Oct 1995 21:21:06 GMT
Lines:	11
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <44rudk$otd AT fg70 DOT rz DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de>,
Thomas Koenig <Thomas DOT Koenig AT ciw DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de> wrote:
>Is there anything wrong with putting a GNAT newgroup either under gnu.*,
>alt.*, or maybe comp.lang.ada.gnat?  Comments?  Should I start a prposal
>for either alt.* or comp.*?  Who should be contacted for putting it
>under gnu.*?

Why do we need another newsgroup?  I'm perfectly happy to read about
GNAT and other Ada-related stuff all in one place: comp.lang.ada.

- Bob

- Raw text -